Human Benchmark Reaction Time
If you have tested on Human Benchmark and want to understand how those scores compare to 67Record, this page explains the methodology differences and how to interpret results from both platforms.
Human Benchmark Methodology
Human Benchmark's reaction time test displays a green box on a red background and measures the time from color change to mouse click. This is a clean, well-designed simple reaction time test. Their database of millions of scores provides excellent statistical context — their average of 250–275 ms is one of the largest reaction time datasets publicly available.
How 67Record Compares
67Record uses camera-based hand tracking instead of click measurement. The two methodologies measure related but slightly different aspects of reaction performance. Hand-tracking scores typically run 25–50 ms higher than click-test scores from the same person, because of the additional motor steps in forming a hand gesture versus pressing a pre-positioned button.
Which Platform to Use
Use Human Benchmark if you want to compare yourself to a massive global database using a standardized click-test format. Use 67Record if you want to measure physical hand-movement reaction speed, avoid click-test biases, and track improvement without ads or account requirements.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a 250ms Human Benchmark score equivalent to a 250ms 67Record score?
Not directly. The same person will typically score 25–50 ms slower on 67Record's hand-tracking test than on Human Benchmark's click test. Both measure real aspects of reaction performance, but through different physical mechanisms.
Try 67Record now and compare your scores across both platforms.
Try the 67 Speed Challenge